View Single Post

  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:13 AM
TSIMonster's Avatar
TSIMonster TSIMonster is offline
Member
1,000,000 Points
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Probably at your girlfriends right now...... having tea
Posts: 933
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKH404 View Post
the hd4870x2 runs faster on 1680x1050 than 1024x768 O.o even the hd4870 beats the hd4870x2 at 1024x768...
Yeah, but who in their right mind would use a 4870x2 for 1024x768? (Of course, a friend of mine was using an 8800Ultra for 1024x768, lol)


Although it is weird. It really makes no sense. Probably just a driver issue. The driver team, I would imagine, concentrated less on low resolution performance than high?

(BTW, I have almost beat Crysis, so I'll try this out soon)
__________________
GSX:
-ASUS P5Q Pro
-E8500@4.25Ghz
-Xigmatek S1283
-HD4870
-4GB PC2 8000
-1.25TB Storage
-ZALMAN 850 Watt
-Kworld HD TV Tuner
-24" P-MVA 1920x1200
-Windows 7 Ultimate 64
-15335 3DMark06 So far...

BLAH: ASUS M2A-VM|Phenom@2.6Ghz|OEM Cooler|XFX8800GTS 320|3GB 800Mhz|WD 500GB |Antec Earthwatts 430|

Beefy: Gigabyte P35-DS3L\Q6600\2GB 667Mhz\OCZ700 Watt\8800GT

IDK: Gigabyte 965-DS3/E6600@3Ghz/GTX260/2GB 667Mhz/Coolmax700 Watt

Last edited by TSIMonster; 10-10-2008 at 05:32 AM.
Reply With Quote