 |
|
10-06-2008, 09:16 AM
|
|
User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSIMonster
(You could get the 3DMark scores from another site well known to us, lol) And we have enough members here using GPU clients to provide that data. You could put a ~ in front of the numbers to indicate that it is a rough estimate/number
|
That might be construed as plagiarism. :P We could get into legal troubles if we did that.
I suppose a relative performance bar could be used using data from several sites without copying over the actual numbers. This could give folks a relative performance comparison without doing a HUGE roundup. |
10-06-2008, 10:51 AM
|
 |
Premium Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint Louis Missouri
Posts: 1,443
|
|
|
I don't think this would be a waste. It's always nice to condense information into forms easy to peruse
__________________
Quote:
When the sands are all dry, he is gay as a lark, And will talk in contemptuous tones of the Shark:
But, when the tide rises and sharks are around, His voice has a timid and tremulous sound.
-Alice's Recitation
Lewis Carroll
|
|
10-06-2008, 10:59 AM
|
 |
XCPUs.com Editor
1,000,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,160
|
|
|
I can provide PPD on 3 cards with and without SMP also running.
__________________
 
|
10-06-2008, 11:42 AM
|
 |
Super Member
100,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI USA
Posts: 1,429
|
|
|
I think it's a fantastic idea, and many people would love to see PPD incorporated into it.
__________________
TRITON: Q6600 | GA-P35-DS3L | 6GB G.Skill DDR2-800 | EVGA 9600GSO SC | Lian Li PC-65 | Corsair 550VX PSU | Vista Ultimate x64
PHOBOS: Turion 64 X2 1.8GHz Dell Inspiron
DEIMOS: E4300 Terabyte File Server
|
10-06-2008, 01:26 PM
|
 |
Super Member
500,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,326
|
|
|
You should do a PPD scale! Have an abundant 8800GT be the 1.00 and then place the cards around that scale to make it easy. A GTX 280 would be like 2.10 etc.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicLess
Warning: Enter Speak Freely Theads At Own Mental Risk.
|
Track
800m - 2:05.24
Cross Country
5k - 17:09 dominated that course.
#1 Fan of Tool and Tanker.
-Steve Leonhardt
WHS '10
Facebook me
|
 |
|
 |
10-06-2008, 01:37 PM
|
 |
Xtreme Modder
250,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, Ca
Posts: 969
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
I actually think this is a great idea.
With more and more cards being folding-capable, I've more than once wanted to have a reference where I could find clocks/shaders/etc.
|
I too think this is a great idea. I would trust our sites results more than a site that is getting free cards sent to them from both companies.
Also, because our site is so heavily focused on our Folding, it would be great to show how many PPD certain cards can generate. That right there is enough incentive to get thousands more people coming to the site to see what card would be best for them for folding.
__________________
3lfk1ng's Tech Assault
e3110 @ 4.25 GHz Q746A545 | Asus x48 Rampage Formula | 8GB G.Skill F2-8500CL5D | Sapphire 4870 512mb| OCZ GameXstream 850W | Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme |
Auzen X-FI Prelude | Custom Thermaltake Kandalf | Crystalfontz-635 | Gateway FPD2485W 24" | Klipsch Promedia 2.1 | G7 | G15 | Black Icemat | Dual Boot XP Pro & Ultimate x64
|
10-06-2008, 01:41 PM
|
|
User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,117
|
|
All right then... working on it 
This might take a while ..  |
10-06-2008, 01:52 PM
|
 |
魚類打耳光時間！
2,000,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,756
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lionhardt
You should do a PPD scale! Have an abundant 8800GT be the 1.00 and then place the cards around that scale to make it easy. A GTX 280 would be like 2.10 etc.
|
If I was going to make a scale, I would put the lowest card as the 1.0, and everything up from there. (We don't want a card being .0001 on the scale  ) |
10-06-2008, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 483
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirrobin4ever
If I was going to make a scale, I would put the lowest card as the 1.0, and everything up from there. (We don't want a card being .0001 on the scale ) |
But then the highest would be like 29766!
Or, it would be 29766 * N/A ERROR = N/A ERROR  since the lowest could not play all games...
__________________
Antec 1200
Corsair HX620w PSU
AMD x2 3800 EE Overclocked to 2.7ghz 
Asus Crosshair
Sunbeam Core Contact Freezer HSF 
EVGA 8800GTS 640,OC'd to 650/1000mhz 
Team Group Xtreem DDR2-800 4-4-4-10 RAM at 1160
Western Digital 250gig SE16 Hard Drive
Logitech G15 Keyboard, G7 Mouse
Logitech Z-5500 Speakers
Auzentech Prelude Sound Card
|
10-06-2008, 03:14 PM
|
|
魚類打耳光時間！
2,000,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,756
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corvetteguy
But then the highest would be like 29766!
Or, it would be 29766 * N/A ERROR = N/A ERROR since the lowest could not play all games... |
Actually, I don't think it'd be that high, considering that the lowest F@H capable card (AFAIK) is the 8400gs. Maybe the 2400 Pro....hmm |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:13 AM. |
|
|
