 |
 |
"19 graphic cards ran Crysis: Warhead" |
 |
10-09-2008, 04:34 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Savannah
Posts: 299
|
|
|
"19 graphic cards ran Crysis: Warhead"
19 graphic cards ran Crysis: Warhead
Date: 2008/10/9
Author: hardspell
Product Class: Video HARDSPELL.COM-19 graphic cards ran Crysis: Warhead
Article Index PAGE 1:-Test setup and introductions...
PAGE 2:-1024x768, Medium quality...
PAGE 3:-1024x768, Medium quality...
PAGE 4:-1024x768, Medium quality, all products results...
PAGE 5:-1024x 768, high quality...
PAGE 6:-1680x1050, high quality...
PAGE 7:-1024x 768, very high qulity...
PAGE 8:-1680x1050, very high qulity...
PAGE 9:-Beautiful pictures of Crysis: Warhead (1)...
PAGE 10:-Beautiful pictures of Crysis: Warhead (2)...
PAGE 11:-Beautiful pictures of Crysis: Warhead (3)...
PAGE 12:-Beautiful pictures of Crysis: Warhead (4)... |
10-09-2008, 04:38 PM
|
 |
Premium Member
500,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 3,700
|
|
|
Looks like it runs a bit better than Crysis, as we know.
Too bad they didn't use a GTX 280...
__________________
E8600 @ 5.1! 8GB G-Skill DDR2-1000 Asus Maximus II FormulaeVGA 9800 GX2 @ 780/1900/1180
5Ghz club 5.4Ghz (aircooled) club
Quote o' the week:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mushroomhead
Nails through hands and feet, on this cedar grave, atone for sin, can this be, can my soul be saved? All alone, I think too much, need to believe, in something real, don't need this crutch because it just deceives.
|
|
10-09-2008, 06:57 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 355
|
|
|
i played both games n to me, the original crysis looks better, simply cuz it can run on 64 bit. it gives me better fps on higher settings. less stuttering too. I hope Crytek will come out with a 64 bit patch for CW.
__________________
Case: Thermaltake Armor+
Mobo: EVGA Nforce 680i SLI
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo Quad Core Q6600 2.4ghz OC to 3.80Ghz
GPU: EVGA Geforce 9800 GX2 1GB
RAM: Crucial Ballistix Tracer Black PC2 6400 DDR2 800 4GB
CPU Cooling: Water Cooling [Vortex XP aka DTEK Fuzion, 2 x Danger Den Black Ice Extreme 2 , Tygon 1/2"]
PSU: Cooler Master Real Power Pro1000
|
10-09-2008, 08:42 PM
|
 |
Super Member
100,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,220
|
|
|
the hd4870x2 runs faster on 1680x1050 than 1024x768 O.o even the hd4870 beats the hd4870x2 at 1024x768...
__________________
Q6600 @ 3.8ghz (1.55v)------ 6gb ddr2 800mhz 4-4-4-12-------- GTX280 700/1460/2600-178.24
Dream about : Core i7 940, 6gb ddr3 2000mhz, x58, Tri SLi GTX280
Myspace
|
|
|
|
10-10-2008, 05:13 AM
|
 |
Member
1,000,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Probably at your girlfriends right now...... having tea
Posts: 850
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKH404
the hd4870x2 runs faster on 1680x1050 than 1024x768 O.o even the hd4870 beats the hd4870x2 at 1024x768...
|
Yeah, but who in their right mind would use a 4870x2 for 1024x768? (Of course, a friend of mine was using an 8800Ultra for 1024x768, lol)
Although it is weird. It really makes no sense. Probably just a driver issue. The driver team, I would imagine, concentrated less on low resolution performance than high?
(BTW, I have almost beat Crysis, so I'll try this out soon)
__________________
GSX:
-ASUS P5Q Pro
-E8500@4.25Ghz
-Xigmatek S1283
-HD4870
-4GB PC2 8000
-1.25TB Storage
-ZALMAN 850 Watt
-Kworld HD TV Tuner
-24" P-MVA 1920x1200
-Vista Ultimate 64
-15335 3DMark06 So far...
BLAH: ASUS M2A-VM|Phenom@2.6Ghz|OEM Cooler|XFX8800GTS 320|3GB 800Mhz|WD 500GB |Antec Earthwatts 430|
Beefy: Gigabyte P35-DS3L\Q6600\2GB 667Mhz\OCZ700 Watt\8800GT
IDK: Gigabyte 965-DS3/E6600@3Ghz/GTX260/2GB 667Mhz/Coolmax700 Watt
Last edited by TSIMonster; 10-10-2008 at 05:32 AM.
|
10-10-2008, 06:27 AM
|
|
Premium Member
500,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 3,700
|
|
|
I suspect that the low resolution doesn't stress enough of the card where it has brute force, and stresses things like core clock and shader clock.
__________________
E8600 @ 5.1! 8GB G-Skill DDR2-1000 Asus Maximus II FormulaeVGA 9800 GX2 @ 780/1900/1180
5Ghz club 5.4Ghz (aircooled) club
Quote o' the week:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mushroomhead
Nails through hands and feet, on this cedar grave, atone for sin, can this be, can my soul be saved? All alone, I think too much, need to believe, in something real, don't need this crutch because it just deceives.
|
|
10-10-2008, 07:11 AM
|
 |
Super Member
100,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI USA
Posts: 1,281
|
|
|
Kind of like maxing out a network connection, requires more than 1 transmission going through the pipe (ie. 2 downloads will use more bandwidth than 1)
__________________
TRITON: Q6600 / GA-P35-DS3L / 3GB DDR2-800 / EVGA 9600GSO SC / Corsair 550VX PSU/ Vista Ultimate x64
PHOBOS: Turion 64 X2 1.8GHz / 2GB DDR2-667 / 120GB HDD / ATi IGP / Vista Ultimate x64
DEIMOS: E4300 / Foxconn M7PMX-S / 1GB DDR2-800 / 120GB x2 + 2x500GB RAID1 / XFX 8500GT / CoolMax 450W / Windows XP Pro
|
10-10-2008, 03:26 PM
|
|
Super Member
100,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,220
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tool_462
I suspect that the low resolution doesn't stress enough of the card where it has brute force, and stresses things like core clock and shader clock.
|
but that wouldnt matter because the hd4870x2 is just to hd4870. im just sticking to driver issue, or crossfire + crysis issue
__________________
Q6600 @ 3.8ghz (1.55v)------ 6gb ddr2 800mhz 4-4-4-12-------- GTX280 700/1460/2600-178.24
Dream about : Core i7 940, 6gb ddr3 2000mhz, x58, Tri SLi GTX280
Myspace
|
10-10-2008, 06:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 355
|
|
well why would u wanna run crysis on 1024x768? it looks crappy as...well..crap  1680x1050 is the way to go
__________________
Case: Thermaltake Armor+
Mobo: EVGA Nforce 680i SLI
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo Quad Core Q6600 2.4ghz OC to 3.80Ghz
GPU: EVGA Geforce 9800 GX2 1GB
RAM: Crucial Ballistix Tracer Black PC2 6400 DDR2 800 4GB
CPU Cooling: Water Cooling [Vortex XP aka DTEK Fuzion, 2 x Danger Den Black Ice Extreme 2 , Tygon 1/2"]
PSU: Cooler Master Real Power Pro1000
|
10-10-2008, 06:26 PM
|
 |
Super Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,758
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquariuz
well why would u wanna run crysis on 1024x768? it looks crappy as...well..crap 1680x1050 is the way to go |
I'm sure 2560x1600 is the real way to go... 
But yeah, 7950GT + Crysis + 1680x1050 = PHAIL.
__________________
THE AWESOMENESS OF COWS
Yes, cows.
|
10-10-2008, 06:30 PM
|
 |
Gunpowder, Treason, Plot
500,000 Points
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: BCAK
Posts: 5,212
|
|
|
I thought 1680 x 1050 was the business until I played it on a 24" screen. 1920 x 1200 (or higher) is sex.
__________________
|| E8400 E0, EK Supreme || Asus P5Q-Deluxe || eVGA GTX 280, D-Tek Fuzion GFX2 || 4GB Mushkin Ascent PC2-8500
|| 2x 74GB Raptor (RAID0) || Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic || 800w OCZ EliteXStream || Silverstone TJ09-BW
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SEAL
I need it MOAR I'm a virgin
|
|
10-11-2008, 06:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 355
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YMAA
I thought 1680 x 1050 was the business until I played it on a 24" screen. 1920 x 1200 (or higher) is sex.
|
Oh yeah surely it is, but for some reason, i dont think my GX2 can handle it, especially once too many thing go on at one time (explosions, lights, bullets, dirt, etc)
well, i'll see about it, im gonna get a 24" in a few days hopefully 
__________________
Case: Thermaltake Armor+
Mobo: EVGA Nforce 680i SLI
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo Quad Core Q6600 2.4ghz OC to 3.80Ghz
GPU: EVGA Geforce 9800 GX2 1GB
RAM: Crucial Ballistix Tracer Black PC2 6400 DDR2 800 4GB
CPU Cooling: Water Cooling [Vortex XP aka DTEK Fuzion, 2 x Danger Den Black Ice Extreme 2 , Tygon 1/2"]
PSU: Cooler Master Real Power Pro1000
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 PM. |
|
|
