I think this might have some promise.
Nvidia, VIA Team Up On Smart Phone Processor Business | CENS.com - The Taiwan Economic News.
Interesting. Nvidia is part of the handset alliance and does keep banging on about this. Nvidia in a Google phone? Being Google it should dominate apple in terms of functionality while still being "cool"Taipei, Aug. 29, 2008 (CENS)--Graphic-processor vendor Nvidia Corp. will work with VIA Technologies Inc. to tap global market of processors for smart phones by integrating Nividia Tegra processor with VIA Nano processor, according to Nvidia Chief Executive Jen-Hsun Huang.
Hung stressed that the collaboration with VIA would be a top priority since his company would begin to venture into the market next year, as would Intel. will introduce Atom processor to compete in the market.
Currently, Texas Instruments (TI), Qualcomm, Marvell Technology, and Samsung are dominating the market.
Huang said at the Nvision 2008 technology forum that smart phone would trigger second personal computing revolution and his company would fully focus on developing smart-phone market as crucial strategy. He noted that computing would replace talking as the major function in next-generation smart phones.
The Nvidia`s top executive noted that his company would develop chipsets for VIA Nano processor and Intel Atom processor as the two processors are developed on the x86 architecture.
Also Nvidia to make atom chipsets, that could be interesting for low power devices too although nvidia chipsets and low power aren't two words I'd usually put in a sentence.
Last edited by djgandy; 08-30-2008 at 02:06 AM.
Asus P5KR
Intel Core2Duo E6400 @ 2.96Ghz (370x8 @ 1.200v : Intel Stock HSF)
4GB Crucial Ballstix / Tracers PC-8500
Asus 8800GT 512mb
Windows XP SP2
I think this might have some promise.
Folding@Home: Fighting diseases 1 WU at a time.
DFI LP Jr. P45 | Xeon X3320 | XFX 4770 | Corsair HX620 | Thermalright SI128SE | Other stuff | Lian-Li PC-V350B
I wonder why kind of fan the thing needs to keep cool.....
It may take a village to raise a child, but it only takes one child to raze a village.
Considering that Via's Nano(the chip itself) uses on the order of 10x the power of Atom and nVidia doesn't exactly have experience with low power motherboards for x86, this doesn't seem like it will work all that well. Via does have the lead in low power chipsets, but I wonder how well they will fare when Intel starts using a modern technology for the chipset. In any case, I really don't see nVidia as being very important in terms of the technology they will bring to the table. Their important contribution will likely be funding.
Last edited by fidgewinkle; 08-30-2008 at 12:21 AM.
blog
Chronicle of a frankenputer:
1993 AST 25MHz 486SX, VESA local bus video, 4 MB RAM, 170MB HDD, 3.5 & 5.25 floppies
1994 16Bit soundcard
1995 840MB HDD, 16 MB(32bit) SIMM, overclocked to 33MHz
1996 16X CDROM, 486 DX2 50MHz Overdrive processor, overclocked to 66MHz
1997 133MHz Pentium Overdrive processor
1997 Upgraded to Pentium motherboard with 16MB EDO memory, 3D video card.
1998 modem and 180MB HDD
1999 52X CDROM
2001 Retired
XCPUS artwork by verndewd
ya fidge i dont really understand this either
maybe they are banking on the fact that it will be an alternative?
they may make a few bucks from it
Well the 945 is a crap chipset. I've not seen news that Intel are not going to upgrade it either, they are going to integrate the chipset next year.
Asus P5KR
Intel Core2Duo E6400 @ 2.96Ghz (370x8 @ 1.200v : Intel Stock HSF)
4GB Crucial Ballstix / Tracers PC-8500
Asus 8800GT 512mb
Windows XP SP2