+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: 256 Cores In Task Manager??

  1. 01-06-2009 11:06 PM #1
    1Tanker's Avatar
    1Tanker
    1Tanker is offline Sarcastic S.O.B. 500,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,046

    256 Cores In Task Manager??

    Thanks to MS actually making an improvement....in Windows 7, 256 cores can now be recognized.

    Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 group logical processors into sub groups and it would therefore make sense that the task manager be redesigned to show the performance of processors by group. Without which you'll definitely need a 30" LCD. That said however, if you can afford a 256 logical processor machine then you'll probably be able to find a few extra dollars for a large display.



    Check Out Task Manager!!
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 01-06-2009 11:07 PM #2
    Dean's Avatar
    Dean
    Dean is offline Intel FanBoi! 1,000,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    6,162
    Yeah... already saw that. Awesome!

    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 01-06-2009 11:43 PM #3
    beerandcandy's Avatar
    beerandcandy
    beerandcandy is offline Uber Member 100,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    foresthill, CA
    Posts
    3,439
    now they just need 256 seperate schedulers
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 01-06-2009 11:48 PM #4
    Afrodisiac
    Afrodisiac is offline Uber Member 25,000 Points
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    4,529
    Blog Entries
    1
    Finally, an OS that can take advantage of my monster PC.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 01-07-2009 12:22 AM #5
    beerandcandy's Avatar
    beerandcandy
    beerandcandy is offline Uber Member 100,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    foresthill, CA
    Posts
    3,439
    plankton?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 01-07-2009 12:54 AM #6
    Farhang's Avatar
    Farhang
    Farhang is offline The Final Frontier
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sea of Madness
    Posts
    4,093
    When will they release an OS that can recognize all my 1024 cores?
    Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 | ASUS P5N-D | 4GB G.SKILL DDR2 PC2 8000 | SAPPHIRE VAPOR-X HD 4890 | AcBel i8 Power 570 | Tuniq Symmetry 1 | Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB | ViewSonic VX2255wmb

    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 01-07-2009 07:48 PM #7
    Holy_COW's Avatar
    Holy_COW
    Holy_COW is offline Member 100,000 Points
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    381
    Great!

    now we need someone to start coding programs that actually can go and use over 4 cores....

    Detailed BC2 Stats: http://bfbcs.com/stats_pc/Holy.COW



    Main PC: X3350 @ 3.4Ghz | Rampaged Maximus | 8GB Dominator 1066 | HD5870 Watercooled | Stacker 832
    Enermaxx Galaxy 850W | Dell 2408WFP | 2xST 1.5TB on R0 (os+games) + R1 (data) | Custom WC

    You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 01-08-2009 12:40 PM #8
    MagicLess's Avatar
    MagicLess
    MagicLess is online now No Dot Sam 250,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oshkosh, WI
    Posts
    3,676
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Holy_COW View Post
    Great!

    now we need someone to start coding programs that actually can go and use over 4 cores....
    Apparently whoever was using that 256-core machine was doing just fine with that.
    Think, Hold that thought, Complete.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 01-14-2009 01:50 AM #9
    mew905's Avatar
    mew905
    mew905 is offline Member 500,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    494
    as someone on that other site said... what in gods name are they using that;s got all 256 cores at 91%?


    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 01-14-2009 04:36 AM #10
    Farhang's Avatar
    Farhang
    Farhang is offline The Final Frontier
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sea of Madness
    Posts
    4,093
    Doom II?
    Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 | ASUS P5N-D | 4GB G.SKILL DDR2 PC2 8000 | SAPPHIRE VAPOR-X HD 4890 | AcBel i8 Power 570 | Tuniq Symmetry 1 | Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB | ViewSonic VX2255wmb

    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 01-14-2009 10:03 AM #11
    MagicLess's Avatar
    MagicLess
    MagicLess is online now No Dot Sam 250,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oshkosh, WI
    Posts
    3,676
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by mew905 View Post
    as someone on that other site said... what in gods name are they using that;s got all 256 cores at 91%?
    I was thinking about it, and would a bunch of virtual machines do it easily enough?
    Think, Hold that thought, Complete.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 01-14-2009 10:10 AM #12
    Dean's Avatar
    Dean
    Dean is offline Intel FanBoi! 1,000,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    6,162
    Quote Originally Posted by MagicLess View Post
    I was thinking about it, and would a bunch of virtual machines do it easily enough?
    Dude, it's Intel. They have an army of developers with fewer problems than they have solutions for. I'm sure they just built something to spin up 256 threads that all crunch away at something. It wouldn't take much time at all to do that.

    -Dean

    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 01-14-2009 10:12 AM #13
    Kevorski's Avatar
    Kevorski
    Kevorski is offline Member 250,000 Points
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Spokompton
    Posts
    133
    im confused about how they have 256 cores...anyone care to try and explain it to me please?
    KEVORSKI

    INTEL CORE I7 920 @3.92GHz w/TRUE 120|| GIGABYTE X58|| THERMALTAKE SPEDO|| SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 4850X2 512 GPU Clock: 690MHz, Memory Clock: 1.18GHz|| PC POWER AND COOLING 750W|| 1.5TB SEAGATE BARRACUDA|| CORSAIR XMS3 DDR3 6GB 9-8-8-24
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 01-14-2009 10:17 AM #14
    mew905's Avatar
    mew905
    mew905 is offline Member 500,000 Points
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    494
    Sun has a server system that has 8x8x4 processors, I believe it's 8 chips per node, 8 cores per chip, and 4 threads per core, registering under Windows 7 as 256 cores, while there's 64 physical processor cores, windows reads thread capabilities as logical cores (ever notice a P4 with HTT registers as dual core? or a core i7 will register as octo-core). It's far from a home PC though which is understandable for the confusion.


    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 01-14-2009 10:19 AM #15
    Afrodisiac
    Afrodisiac is offline Uber Member 25,000 Points
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    4,529
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevorski View Post
    im confused about how they have 256 cores...anyone care to try and explain it to me please?
    Theoretical.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 01-14-2009 09:36 PM #16
    Blake's Avatar
    Blake
    Blake is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    499
    maybe Intel/MS is doing a smart thing with larabee and letting the os use the cores if it needs to, with a few locked of to render the gui. a core i7 with 4x larabee would have what, 136 logical cores (assuming 32 per card)? then what if gen 2 had hyperthreading...
    Desktop: C2Q Q9650, GA-EP45-UD3P, 8GBDDRII 1066mhz Kingston HyperX, Asus 5850 1GB, 24" LCD, 5x 1TB HDDs
    Server: C2D E6550, Asus P5K, 2GB kingston stuff, 4870 512mb, 2x 120GB & 160GB HDDs, headless.
    Lappy: MSI Wind NetBook

    Also my Keyboard Has Cruise Control.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 01-15-2009 03:55 PM #17
    The_DJax's Avatar
    The_DJax
    The_DJax is offline Member 100,000 Points
    Send a message via MSN to The_DJax
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    469
    So.... much..... power..... consumption.....

    ......

    ...urgh....
    Desktop: Intel Core i7 860 Lynnfield 2.8 Ghz @ 3.40 Ghz | Gigabyte P55-UD5 | 4 GB DDR3 G. Skill Ripjaws | Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 | Creative X-Fi Platinum | Corsair 750TX PSU | Antec 900 Case
    Laptop: Dell Studio XPS 16
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
+ Reply to Thread
« Beta test version will be available Friday for regular PC users to download | Windows Vista 64Bit Partition Software (Free) »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules